Yesterday, DeepSeek just wiped $1tn off the US stock marketโโshould we embrace its groundbreaking AI despite concerns over censorship, data security, and ethical implications?
๐ช๐ต๐ ๐ถ๐ ๐๐ฒ๐ฒ๐ฝ๐ฆ๐ฒ๐ฒ๐ธ ๐ฎ ๐ง๐ฒ๐ฐ๐ต๐ป๐ผ๐น๐ผ๐ด๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐น ๐๐ฎ๐บ๐ฒ-๐๐ต๐ฎ๐ป๐ด๐ฒ๐ฟ?
This Chinese AI model is flipping the script in a big way. Training DeepSeek to become โsmartโ costs 20 times less in processors compared to its American competitors. Naturally, Nvidiaโthe go-to supplier of those pricey processors, one of Americaโs top AI giantsโtook a massive hit, with its stock plummeting and dragging along that jaw-dropping $600 billion loss. Ouch.
๐๐ก๐จ๐ฎ๐ฅ๐ ๐๐จ๐ฎ ๐๐ฌ๐ ๐๐๐๐ฉ๐๐๐๐ค?
Now, beyond the jaw-dropping numbers, hereโs the million-dollar question: should we even use DeepSeek? Technology isnโt some neutral toolโit comes baked with the values and intentions of its creators. Jumping on the DeepSeek bandwagon without thinking critically is like ignoring the moral and political baggage it might carry. Sure, itโs cheaper and crazy powerful, but it appears to censor answers to sensitive questions about China and its government. I strongly encourage you to read its answers when The Guardian asked questions about Tiananmen Square and Taiwan (click on the image below to see a video comparing its answers with ChatGTP's). And what about data security? And are we okay with potentially handing over our information to a state whose track record on human rights and surveillance raises more than a few eyebrows?
๐ง๐ต๐ฒ ๐๐๐ต๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐น ๐๐ถ๐น๐ฒ๐บ๐บ๐ฎ: ๐๐ณ๐ณ๐ถ๐ฐ๐ถ๐ฒ๐ป๐ฐ๐ ๐๐. ๐ฉ๐ฎ๐น๐๐ฒ๐
Hereโs where philosophy swoops in to save the day (thanks, Hans Jonas!). His โprinciple of responsibilityโ urges us to think ahead about how our tech choices might impact humanity and the planet. So, letโs ask ourselves:
- Are we willing to sacrifice our values for efficiency?
- Should we draw clear ethical lines when it comes to innovations like this?
Food for thought, right? Iโd love to hear where you stand on this tricky balancing act!